Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 KAN 737 - Hessen v. Sapp

Hessen v. Sapp’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 1927
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Coblentz v. Putifer · Davidson v. Timmons · Munn v. Gordon · Blodgett v. Yocum · Vickers v. Buck Stove & Range Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The statements of the nonexpert witnesses that they regarded Culbertson as incapable of transacting important business seems unlikely to have influenced the jury’s conception of what impairment of his faculties was necessary to render the deed inoperative. Moreover the jury were acting only in an advisory capacity. The decision finally reached was that of the judge, and there is no likelihood that he was in any way misled by the form in which any of the evidence referred to was presented.” (p. 739.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.