Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 Md. 175 - Maynadier v. Armstrong

Maynadier v. Armstrong’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2018

14 state decisions

40190319101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. Gehr · Pegg v. Warford · Barroll & Cannell v. Reading

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen that Court is actually engaged in the hearing of the question whether administrators are entitled to be allowed for such items as these, it might lead to dangerous practices if either party has the right to stop all proceedings in that Court and require issues to be sent to a Court of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.