Mazzone v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1994
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Griffin v. United States · Coleman v. State · State v. Bailey · United States v. Harvey · State v. Baldwin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Information gathered from the wiretaps conducted over Roland Mazzone’s residence telephone as well as the business telephone of the Valley View Inn has identified Mazzone’s wife, Elizabeth Ann, as being involved in this illegal controlled dangerous substance operation. Thus the privilege that is afforded to them under Maryland Law as husband and wife is breached during the interception of conversations that pertain to Mazzone’s illegal drug activity. “All other instructions found under this subheading in the attached Minimization Guidelines dated June 19, 1991, will be followed during the intercept of the telephone lines identified herein.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mazzone
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.