Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 MO 240 - State v. Taylor

State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1889

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
3
states following
March 1976
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 1976

4 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

901889189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Grant · State v. Clinton · State v. Palmer · State v. Hamilton · Glenn v. Clore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The general moral character of one who has been convicted of an infamous crime may well be considered so degraded as that but little credit ought to be given to his testimony, but it is not necessarily so of one who has been convicted of a mere misdemeanor, or the violation of a city ordinance. * •* * Conviction of an infamous crime tends to show a depraved and corrupt nature, a bad general moral character. Conviction. of a penal offense not infamous may be consistent with a character generally good or bad.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.