Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 MO 555 - State v. Snyder

State v. Snyder’s Empirical Analysis

1889

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
November 1977
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 1977

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 16 state decisions

501889189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Cowan · State ex rel. Webster v. Knight · State ex rel. Wright v. Adams · State v. Spear · Ex parte Snyder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . . there was no justification or excuse for the course pursued by the trial court in failing to enter judgment upon the first verdict . . . The jurors were the sole judges of the heinousness of the offense, and of the punishment to be meted out therefor, and so long as they assessed a punishment within the bounds prescribed by the statute their verdict was beyond the control of any earthly power so far as concerns setting it aside and granting a new trial in opposition to the will of the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ It was a maxim and practice of the common law that no man was to be brought into jeopardy more than once for the same offense. * * * Where the jury was charged with the deliverance of the defendant, — that is, when they are impaneled and sworn, — the indictment being sufficient, and the court being possessed of jurisdiction, his jeopardy began.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “an act of judicial usurpation and oppression without equal in modern times.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.