Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 N.C. App. 442 - State v. Turner

98 N.C. App. 442 - State v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2017

14 state decisions

80199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Odom · State v. Powell · State v. Diaz · State v. Tilley · State v. Tucker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “conspir[ing] with Ernie Lucas to commit the felony of trafficking to deliver to Ernie Lucas 28 grams or more . . . of cocaine.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Although the state's evidence supported [the trial court's] instruction, the indictment does not. "It is a well-established rule in this jurisdiction that it is error, generally prejudicial, for the trial judge to permit a jury to convict upon some abstract theory not supported by the bill of indictment." The kidnapping indictment charges that defendant committed kidnapping only by unlawfully removing the victim "from one place to another." [The trial court] repeatedly instructed the jury that defendant could be convicted if he simply unlawfully restrained the victim, "that is, restricted [her] freedom of movement by force and threat of force."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"The jurors for the State upon their oath present that on or about the date of offense shown and in the county named above the defendant named above unlawfully, willfully and feloniously did kidnap [the victim], a person who had attained the age of 16 years, by unlawfully removing her from one place to another, without her consent, and for the purpose of facilitating the commission of the felonies of First Degree Rape and First Degree Sexual Offense. The victim . . . was sexually assaulted by the defendant."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.