Brown v. Douglas County’s Empirical Analysis
1915
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2015
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Spiech v. Tierney · Sioux City & Pacific Railroad v. Washington County · Grant v. Bartholomew · Nebraska Telephone Co. v. Hall County · First National Bank of Blue Hill v. Webster County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he board of equalization is simply what its name imports, a board for the equalization of values in certain cases. It possesses no powers save those conferred by statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.