Moll v. Hagerbaumer’s Empirical Analysis
1915
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 1977
1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Arterburn v. Beard · Majerus v. Barton · Kendall-Smith Co. v. Lancaster County · Moll v. Hagerbaumer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If plaintiff had an easement, it was open and visible to defendants when they purchased the servient estate. They were therefore chargeable with notice of plaintiff’s roadway right, if any.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miles v. Bodenheim
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.