Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 NJSUPER 22 - State v. Blanchard

State v. Blanchard’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 1985
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1985

8 state decisions

40196719701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gideon v. Wainwright · Mapp v. Ohio · Escobedo v. Illinois · Griffin v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “( 73 S.Ct., at p. 1098 ) See also Malinski v. People of State of New York, 324 U.S. 401 , 65 S.Ct. 781 , 89 L.Ed. 1029 (1945); United States ex rel. Johnson v. Yeager, 327 F. 2 d 311, 318 (3 Cir. 1964). Collateral attack upon judgments of conviction is warranted within the broad concept of fundamental fairness when grave doubts are cast upon the reliability of the determination of defendant's guilt, or, as expressed by Justice Cardozo, when relief is dictated by the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The due process clause cannot be invoked merely because the `fairness' of some proposition of law is in question. The Fourteenth Amendment was not intended to subsume the vast body of local law and to articulate answers of constitutional strength and durability with respect to it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “so honeycombed with references to his participation in the crime that it would have been psychologically impossible for the jury to follow the judge's instructions and ignore these statements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.