Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 N.M. 11 - Lovato v. Lovato

Lovato v. Lovato’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 2013 · most notably DeTevis v. Aragon (1986), Fitzsimmons v. Fitzsimmons (1986)

28 state decisions

2001982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Spingola v. Spingola · Hurley v. Hurley · Michelson v. Michelson · Brister v. Brister · Bingert v. Bingert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Some of the important factors to be considered in a determination of the amount of alimony to be awarded are the needs of the wife, her age, health and the means to support herself, the earning capacity and the future earnings of the husband, the duration of the marriage, and the amount of property owned by the parties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.