Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 N.M. 448 - State v. Santillanes

State v. Santillanes’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
June 2004
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently June 2004 · most notably State v. Gallegos (1989), State v. Grissom (1987)

34 state decisions

160198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Lovasco · State v. Linam · State v. Mascarenas · State v. Duran · Vaughn v. United Nuclear Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “absent constitutional or statutory invalidity, [is] binding upon both parties, and [the] defendant may not accept parts of the agreement and reject others.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Plea agreements, absent constitutional or statutory invalidity, are binding upon both parties[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.