Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 N.M. 77 - State v. Gilbert

State v. Gilbert’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably 1 N.M. Ct. App. 535 - State v. Tollardo (2012), State v. Sanders (1994)

4 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

1001982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Braverman v. United States · United States v. Halbert · State v. Manus · United States v. Morado · State v. Leyba

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “particularly not admissible as to elements of the offense as against a person not a party to the proceeding.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]t is the agreement constituting the conspiracy which the statute punishes. * * A conspiracy is a common design or agreement to accomplish an unlawful purpose or a lawful purpose by unlawful means. * * * [I]t is the object of the conspiracy which is examined when a court evaluates the number of possible conspiracies. Several illegal acts may be involved in reaching one goal. The test is whether the agreement in question has a single, unified purpose or a common end.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the purpose of questioning [the co-defendants] regarding their guilty pleas clearly was not solely to prove existence of a conspiracy in which [the] defendant participated,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.