Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 N.M. 798 - State v. Vallejos

State v. Vallejos’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2009

17 state decisions

90198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Graves v. United States · State v. Day · United States v. Merryman · State v. Nelson · State v. Trujillo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “New Mexico law permits comment, in closing argument, concerning the failure to call a witness. U.J.I.Crim. 40.10 and Committee commentary * * * U.J.I.Civil 21.4 and Committee Comment * * * State v. Martin, 32 N.M. 48 , 250 P. 842 (1926). * * * * * * Such an inference may or may not be valid. Because such an inference may be urged by both sides, and is a “mere matter of argument” by the attorneys, New Mexico trusts “to the good sense of the jury to properly estimate the value of such arguments.” State v. Martin, supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.