Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 NY 311 - Shipman v. . Rollins

Shipman v. . Rollins’s Empirical Analysis

1885

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
8
states following
May 1974
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently May 1974 · most notably Tilden v. . Green (1891), Rudd v. . Cornell (1902)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 58 state decisions

2201885189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Warner v. . Durant · Savage v. . Burnham · Holmes v. . Mead · Vincent v. . Newhouse · Power v. . Cassidy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It should he borne in mind, that the fund out of which the legacies in question wore, to ho paid had no legal existence until the decease of the testator’s widow. It was upon the happening of that event that it was to be created, and it was only then that it could be ascertained what the fund would bo. It might be.more or less, according to the exigencies provided for by the will, and it might be nothing, and it was only in case a balance remained that the same was to be divided as directed. It was then to be disposed of or given away, and not before that time. * * * In Vincent v. Newhouse, 83 N. Y. 505 , the testator, by Ms will, gave certain lands to Ms wife for life and directed that at her death the lands should be sold by the executor, and the proceeds eomally divided among three of his children named, and the children of three others, share and share alike, and if cither of the heirs mentioned should die after the date of his will, and before their shares were paid them, the share of the one so dying without issue to be equally divided among the other heirs before named, and it was held that the will intended a conversion of the land into money, the actual conversion, however, not to take place until the termination of the life estate, and that the land was converted into money* from the time the sale was directed to be made, and that no portion of the remainder vested at the death of the testator, but only upon the death of the widow.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where'there is no gift, but by a direction to executors or trustees to pay or divide, and to pay at a future time, the vesting in the beneficiary will not take place until that time arrives.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.