Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 NY 342 - Lambert v. . Craft

Lambert v. . Craft’s Empirical Analysis

1885

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
May 1939
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 1939

22 state decisions

100188518901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kellogg & Sandford v. Potter · McNulty v. . Hurd · Hurlburt v. . Durant · Hoyt v. . Bonnett · Matter of Application, Etc., of MacAulay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The citation brings in the executor, not to plead or respond to the petition, but, by a verified written answer, to set forth aflirmatively facts, if he has any, which show that it is doubtful whether the petitioner’s claim is valid and legal, and also denying its validity or legality, absolutely, or upon information and belief. Both conditions must concur.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.