Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 Ohio App. 3d 249 - State v. Ivey

98 Ohio App. 3d 249 - State v. Ivey’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
2
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably 125 Ohio App. 3d 707 - State v. Burdine-Justice (1998), 154 Ohio App. 3d 219 - State v. Krull (2003)

49 state decisions

2301994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · Stanley v. Illinois · State v. Bradley · State v. Long · State v. Adams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ny physical harm that carries a substantial risk of death.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'an act which inflicts serious physical harm or creates a substantial risk of serious harm to the physical health or safety of the child.' " State v. Haley , 12th Dist. Butler No. CA2012-10-211, 2013-Ohio-4123 , 2013 WL 5372876 , ¶ 10, quoting State v. Burdine-Justice , 125 Ohio App.3d 707 , 714, 709 N.E.2d 551 (12th Dist.1998). The term "child abuse”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Parents are responsible for the -6- upbringing, education and discipline of their children, as parents have a fundamental liberty interest in the care, custody and management of a child.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.