Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 Ohio App. 3d 355 - State v. Saunders

98 Ohio App. 3d 355 - State v. Saunders’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2025

18 state decisions

601994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Doyle v. Ohio · State v. Schiebel · State v. Smith · Fletcher v. Weir · State v. Johnston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a reviewing court must undertake a due process analysis to determine whether the conduct of the prosecutor deprived the defendant of his or her due process right to a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.