98 Ohio App. 3d 396 - Graham v. Graham’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably 125 Ohio App. 3d 600 - Zeffe v. Zeefe (1998), 119 Ohio App. 3d 609 - Kucmanic v. Kucmanic (1997)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · Nolan v. Nolan · Kunkle v. Kunkle · Kaechele v. Kaechele · 83 Ohio App. 3d 559 - Layne v. Layne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unreasonable, arbitrary or unconscionable.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“indicate the basis for its award in sufficient detail”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“If the trial court fails to do so, the appellate court may remand the matter to the trial court, instructing it to provide adequate reasoning and detail regarding the basis of its decision to permit a proper review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Talley v. Talley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.