98 Ohio App. 3d 412 - State v. Sibert’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
63 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably 112 Ohio App. 3d 521 - State v. Hopfer (1996), 127 Ohio App. 3d 511 - State v. Thompson (1998)
63 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · State v. Jenks · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The admission or exclusion of evidence rests within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a]ny error, defect, irregularity, or variance which does not affect substantial rights”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“The relevant inquiry is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Scott · State v. Pence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.