98 Ohio App. 3d 549 - State v. Hollis’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably State v. A.P. (2018), 139 Ohio App. 3d 875 - State v. McNamee (2000)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Miller v. California · Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New York · Roaden v. Kentucky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'While there is no arbitrary time limit on how old information can be, the alleged facts must justify the conclusion that the subject contraband is probably on the person or premises to be searched.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“the duty of a reviewing court is simply to ensure that the magistrate had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`Whether the proof meets this test must be determined by the circumstances of each case.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.