98 Ohio App. 3d 597 - Doner v. Snapp’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 district · 223 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 302 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “the existence of a contract, performance by the plaintiff, breach by the defendant, and damage or loss to the plaintiff.”

   22 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Werthmann v. Donet, Inc., Unpublished Decision (6-24-2005) · Mahon-Evans Realty v. Gunkelman, Unpublished Decision (9-28-2007)

2. ““ ‘The appositeness of rendering a summary judgment hinges upon the tripartite demonstration: (1) that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact; (2) that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; and (3) that reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion, and that conclusion is adverse to the party against whom the motion for summary judgment is made, who is entitled to have the evidence construed most strongly in his favor.’ ” Doner v. Snapp (1994), 98 Ohio App.3d 597, 600 , 649 N.E.2d 42, 43-44 , quoting Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. (1978), 54 Ohio St.2d 64, 66 , 8 O.O.3d 73, 74 , 375 N.E.2d 46, 47 .”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 111 Ohio App. 3d 23 - Snell v. Salem Avenue Associates · 112 Ohio App. 3d 174 - Heinz v. Steffen

3. “'To successfully prosecute a breach of contract claim, a plaintiff must present evidence of (1) the existence of a contract, (2) plaintiff's performance of the contract, (3) defendant's breach of the contract, and (4) plaintiff's loss or damage as a result of defendant's breach.'”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. You v. Northeast Ohio Med. Univ. · Ta v. Chaudhry