98 Ohio App. 3d 748 - Moell v. Moell’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
72 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Clark v. Clark (2006), Austin v. Austin (2007)
72 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · Cherry v. Cherry · Kunkle v. Kunkle · Holcomb v. Holcomb · 11 Ohio App. 3d 279 - Taylor v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Many factors may be considered in deciding whether cohabitation exists in a particular set of facts. We previously addressed the issue of cohabitation in Dickerson v. Dickerson, supra. In that case, we noted that "cohabitation”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]ithout a showing of support, merely living together is insufficient to permit termination of alimony;”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f the ex-spouse is living with another person, and that person provides financial support or is supported, then the underlying need for spousal support does not exist.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.