98 Ohio App. 3d 773 - State v. Mulkey’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2026
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Jenks · Moran v. Burbine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'one that a rational person would form on the basis of the observed facts.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the state, was more than sufficient to show that [the defendant] had adopted a plan to kill [the driver] prior to exiting [the] vehicle and that, with a level of precision, [the defendant] followed through on his calculated decision to kill.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harris“The second requirement of Evid.R. 701 mandates that 'the opinion must assist the trier of fact in understanding the testimony of the witness or in determining a fact in issue.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Scott
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.