State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
299 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 300 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably State v. Palmer (2007), State v. Sanchez (2006)
299 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Bradley · State v. Barnes · State v. Moreland · State v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 300 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny period of delay necessitated by reason of a plea in bar or abatement, motion, proceeding, or action made or instituted by the accused.”
23 later decisions quote this exact passage“discovery requests by a defendant divert the attention of prosecutors from preparing their case for trial, thus necessitating delay.”
20 later decisions quote this exact passage“A demand for discovery or a bill of particulars is a tolling event pursuant to R.C. 2945.72(E).”
19 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.