State v. Wright

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 2003

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2003-04-09

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 2014

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-04-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1{¶ 1} The certification of conflict is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified; there is want of a conflict.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cooney, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., concur.Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent.Colleen Conway Cooney, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for Cook, J.Carol A. Wright, for appellant.Jim Petro, Attorney General, David M. Gormley, State Solicitor, and Kirk A. Lindsey, Associate Solicitor, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Attorney General of Ohio.David L. Doughten and Paul Skendelas, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.