Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

98 Ohio St. 3d 1459

State v. Campbell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 2003

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2003-02-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2003

1 state decisions

Relies on 57 Ohio App. 3d 110 - State v. Marinik

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-02-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Hamilton App. No. C-010727, 2002-Ohio-6064. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Entry Granting Motion to Certify Conflict dated December 9, 2002:

¶2“Whether the amendment of the charging instrument from one subsection of R.C. 4511.19 to another subsection of R.C. 4511.19 changes the name and identify of the crime charged in violation of Ohio Criminal Rule 7(D)?”

F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and O’Connor, JJ., dissent.

¶3The conflict case in State v. Marinik (1989), 57 Ohio App.3d 110, 567 N.E.2d 310.

/98/ohiost3d/1459 · .json · Public domain