98 Or. App. 407 - State v. Mundt’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Campbell · State v. Keller · State v. Atkinson · Pickens v. State · In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Because wallets or purses are primarily intended to be used to store valuables, it may be important to discover what is in them, both to protect the owner's property and to prevent the assertion of false claims against the police. Both are legitimate purposes for inventories of impounded property. Although other containers may also hold valuable property, wallets and purses are uniquely designed for that purpose."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The guidelines obviously were phrased generally to require inventory of every type of container designed or objectively likely to contain money or valuables, including wallets.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'[i]ndicate the breakdown of all cash and negotiable checks by coin, currency, and checks.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.