State v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2007
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lane v. Peterson · Adair v. United States · Goldberg v. Ellett · 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway · 125 Wash. 2d 212 - State v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Except as authorized by this chapter, it is unlawful for any person to manufacture ... a controlled substance. (1) Any person who violates this subsection with respect to: (ii) amphetamine or methamphetamine, is guilty of a crime . . . (iii) any other controlled substance classified in Schedule I, II, or III, is guilty of a crime.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“in Schedule II [2] but not in former RCW 69.50.401(a)(1)(ii), the language of former RCW 69.50.401(a)(1)(ii) was”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cromwell“ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, or anhydrous ammonia with intent to manufacture methamphetamine,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.