Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 P.3d 809 - State v. Hakimi

State v. Hakimi’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
5
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2021

18 state decisions

110200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 79 Wash. 2d 12 - State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker · 127 Wash. 2d 322 - State v. McFarland · 109 Wash. 2d 222 - State v. Thomas · 101 Wash. 2d 566 - State v. Petrich

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““the doll will not be the subject of any questioning .... [CJhildren do present different issues and different considerations in terms of being witnesses in different cases. They have a peculiar need to find some security in an otherwise insecure setting, I suspect. “I don’t think the doll unduly prejudices, to the extent it prejudices anyone at all; so I will allow it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to (1) make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth, ... and (3) protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.