Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

98 S.C. 114

82 S.E 278

State v. Knox

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 3, 1914

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1914-07-03

Before Rice, J., Anderson. ■ Ab Knox was convicted of assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature, and he appeals. cites: Cross-examination improper: 79 S. C. 197. Charge as to lower offense: 2 Enc. Pleading & Practice 855, 856; 25 Ga. 396; 71 Am. Dec. 181; 14 Am. Crim. Rep, 364; 74 S. C. 459.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Reversed · Decided 1914-07-03

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2002

12 state decisions

301914192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Justice Gage,

¶1 dissenting in part. I concur on the first issue, though I had thought the law to' be otherwise than as stated by the Chief Justice. On the second issue I concur in the rule stated by the Chief Justice; but, applied to the testimony, the rule, in my judgment, sustains the Court below.

¶2 The verdict excluded the plea of self-defense, and made the defendant a wrongdoer. What was the measure of his guilt ? The weapon used was a knife; and it was stated at the bar that the cutting was “rather serious.” In my judgment there was no testimony from which the jury might have drawn a reasonable inference that the defendant was guilty only of simple assault and battery. On that issue of' fact, I dissent.

/98/sc/114 · .json · Public domain