In re McDonald’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Purvis v. Purvis · Premeaux v. Smith · 824 So. 2d 604 - Dennis v. Dennis · 838 So. 2d 226 - In Re Williamson · Varvaris v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n cases of indirect or constructive criminal contempt, "where the trial judge has substantial personal involvement in the prosecution, the accused contemnor must be tried by another judge." ... [E]xamples of "substantial personal involvement in the prosecution" warranting recusal include cases where the trial judge acts as a "one-man grand jury;" where the trial judge is "instrumental in the initiation of the constructive-contempt proceedings;" and where the trial judge "acts as prosecutor and judge."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[c]riminal-contempt defendants are entitled to notice under Mississippi Rule of Civil Procedure 81(d), which requires service of process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the determination should focus on the character of the sanction itself and not the intent of the court imposing the sanction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.