Faellaci v. Faellaci’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
October 2016
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 455 So. 2d 863 - Ex Parte McLendon · 486 So. 2d 408 - Hall v. Mazzone · Ex Parte Couch · 514 So. 2d 877 - Gaston v. Ames · 743 So. 2d 1071 - Ex Parte Wiginton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““‘“It was within the province of the trial court to consider the credibility of the witnesses, to draw reasonable inferences from their testimony and from the documentary evidence introduced at trial, and to assign such weight to various aspects of the evidence as it reasonably may have deemed appropriate.... In order to reverse the trial court ..., we would have to make our own credibility determinations and we would have to reweigh the evidence, neither of which we are allowed to do.” ’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sherrill v. Sherrill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.