Henley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1897
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Bayh v. Sonnenburg (1991), Daugherty v. State (1965)
1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Particular services must mean peculiar services, limited services, not ordinary or general services of an individual.... It seems clear that ordinary services, such as may be required of all citizens or officials by general or valid special laws, are not particular services.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bayh v. Sonnenburg““That no man’s particular services shall be demanded, or property taken, or applied to public use, without the consent of his representatives, or without just compensation being made therefor.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The lawyer takes his license burdened with the obligation to defend pauper prisoners, so the Sheriff and Clerk must take their offices burdened with similar conditions and requirements.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Huskey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.