Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 WASH 154 - Harrison v. Smith

Harrison v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 1976
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 1976

5 state decisions

201917192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dyer v. Dyer · Johnson v. National Bank of Commerce · Kegley v. Skillman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The trial judge, who was obviously in a much better position to exercise such a judgment wisely and justly than are we, was evidently of the opinion that the credible evidence preponderated in favor of respondent. The record gives us no warrant to say that he was wrong.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.