98 Wash. 2d 384 - State v. Rice’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
102 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 102 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably 126 Wash. 2d 136 - State v. Brett (1995), 120 Wash. 2d 156 - State v. Coria (1992)
102 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 5601 (Code Adam Act of 2003)
Relies on Gault · McKeiver v. Pennsylvania · 93 Wash. 2d 329 - State v. Smith · 97 Wash. 2d 385 - Tommy P. v. Board of County Commissioners · 85 Wash. 2d 859 - Darrin v. Gould
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(2) It is the intent of the legislature that a system capable of having primary responsibility for, being accountable for, and responding to the needs of youthful offenders, as defined by this chapter, be established. It is the further intent of the legislature that youth, in turn, be held accountable for their offenses and that both communities and the juvenile courts carry out their functions consistent with this intent. To effectuate these policies, the legislature declares the following to be equally important purposes of this chapter: (a) Protect citizenry from criminal behavior; . . . . (c) Make the juvenile offender accountable for his or her criminal behavior; . . . . (f) Provide necessary treatment, supervision, and custody for juvenile offenders; . . . .”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage“to the fullest possible extent both the purpose of rehabilitation and the purpose of punishment.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. TC · State v. J.N.“[o]ffer the offender an opportunity to improve him or herself”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.