Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 Wash. 2d 563 - State v. Loucks

98 Wash. 2d 563 - State v. Loucks’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
7
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2020

22 state decisions

7019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 82 Wash. 2d 584 - State v. J-R Distributors, Inc. · 3 Md. App. 340 - Terrell v. State · 86 Cal. App. 3d 905 - People v. Craig · 91 Wash. 2d 487 - In Re the Welfare of Wilson · State v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[t]he dangers inherent in the use of dog tracking evidence can only be alleviated by the presence of corroborating evidence.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the handler was qualified by training and experience to use the dog, (2) the dog was adequately trained in tracking humans, (3) the dog has, in actual cases, been found by experience to be reliable in pursuing human track, (4) the dog was placed on track where circumstances indicated the guilty party to have been, and (5) the trail had not become so stale or contaminated as to be beyond the dog's competency to follow.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “susceptible to too many constructions to constitute evidence of his complicity in the . . . burglary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.