Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 Wash. 2d 590 - State v. Holmes

98 Wash. 2d 590 - State v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2000
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2000

10 state decisions

50198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · 94 Wash. 2d 634 - State v. Delmarter · 81 Wash. 2d 155 - Barry & Barry, Inc. v. Department of Motor Vehicles · 85 Wash. 2d 539 - City of Bellevue v. Miller · 94 Wash. 2d 839 - State v. Ermert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a prosecution for theft under RCW 9A.56 it is not necessary that the defendant either know the value of the property he has taken or intend to acquire a particular dollar amount of property. Neither factor is an element of theft even though 'intent to deprive' is a necessary element. State v. Delmarter, 94 Wn.2d 634 , 618 P.2d 99 (1980).... The State need only prove that the applicant made a willfully false statement or material omission which resulted in an overpayment. The State must prove the amount of overpayment in order to prove a particular degree of theft, State v. Sass, 94 Wn.2d 721 , 620 P.2d 79 (1980), but the defendant's awareness of that amount is not in issue.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The State need only prove that the applicant made a willfully false statement or material omission which resulted in an overpayment. The State must prove the amount of overpayment in order to prove a particular degree of theft. . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “shall be guilty of grand larceny and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by imprisonment in a state correctional facility for not more than fifteen years.” However, RCW 9A.56.100 provides that”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.