Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 WASHAPP 260 - Friebe v. Supancheck

Friebe v. Supancheck’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 2010

3 state decisions

10199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 92 Wash. 2d 576 - Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc. · 41 Wash. App. 897 - In Re the Marriage of Yearout · 32 Wash. App. 135 - State v. Keller · 50 Wash. 2d 42 - Platts v. Arney · 108 Wash. 2d 26 - Sahalee Country Club, Inc. v. Board of Tax Appeals

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Mistakes; Inadvertence; Excusable Neglect; Newly Discovered Evidence; Fraud; etc. On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) Mistakes, inadvertence, surprise, excusable neglect or irregularity in obtaining a judgment or order;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “supported by the affidavit of the applicant or his attorney setting forth a concise statement of the facts or errors upon which the motion is based, and if the moving party be a defendant, the facts constituting a defense to the action or proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(11) Any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment. The motion shall be made within a reasonable time and for reasons (1), (2) or (3) not more than 1 year after the judgment, order, or proceeding was entered or taken.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.