98 Wash. App. 342 - State v. Mahone’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
23 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Blank · 20 Wash. 2d 88 - State Ex Rel. Simeon v. Superior Court · 63 Wash. App. 900 - Primark, Inc. v. Burien Gardens Associates · 50 Wash. 2d 365 - Harp v. American Surety Co. of New York · 95 Wash. App. 761 - Tinker v. Kent Gypsum Supply, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Before Mahone is aggrieved, as defined in RAP 3.1, two things must happen. It must be determined that he has the ability to pay and the State must proceed to enforce the judgment for costs. Until such time as the State determines he has the ability to pay and enforces payment of the costs assessed against him, any attempt to determine whether payment will create a hardship is mere speculation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“until the State seeks to enforce payment and contemporaneously determines his ability to pay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.