State v. Twyman’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2001
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 125 Wash. 2d 129 - Carrick v. Locke · 120 Wash. 2d 549 - State v. Rice · 117 Wash. 2d 595 - State v. Tingdale · State v. Newcomb · State v. Rholeder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The manner of making up the jury lists indicated by the statute is merely directory, and need be only substantially complied with.... The purpose of all these statutes is to provide a fair and impartial jury, and if that end has been attained and the litigant has had the benefit of such a jury, it ought not to be held that the whole proceeding must be annulled because of some slight irregularity . . . .[ 23 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Twyman“In courts of limited jurisdiction, juries shall be selected and impaneled in the same manner as in the superior courts, except that a court of limited jurisdiction shall use the master jury list developed by the superior court to select a jury panel. Jurors for the jury panel may be selected at random from the population of the area served by the court.[ 12 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Twyman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.