State v. M.R.C.’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 127 Wash. 2d 322 - State v. McFarland · 107 Wash. 2d 196 - In Re the Detention of LaBelle · 67 Wash. App. 339 - State v. Lynn · 100 Wash. 2d 832 - Dunner v. McLaughlin · 77 Wash. 2d 94 - Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Gravely disabled" means a condition in which a person, as a result of a mental disorder: (a) Is in danger of serious physical harm resulting from a failure to provide for his or her essential human needs of health or safety; or (b) manifests severe deterioration in routine functioning evidenced by repeated and escalating loss of cognitive or volitional control over his or her actions and is not receiving such care as is essential for his or her health or safety[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. MRC“See RCW 71.05.280. These grounds are in the alternative, and the State filed the petition for M.R.C. on both grounds. The trial court found that both grounds were proved. RCW 71.05.020(9) defines”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. MRC
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.