98 Wash. App. 75 - State v. Nolan’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 71 Ill. 2d 166 - People v. Nicholls · 125 Wash. 2d 212 - State v. Wilson · State v. Blank · Duke v. Boyd · In Re Detention of Petersen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]here the State is the substantially prevailing party and timely requests recoupment as authorized by RCW 10.73.160, the award of costs is virtually automatic—subject to the commissioner’s resolution of any disputes regarding the reasonableness of the expenses and their necessity to the process of review—and subject to the right of the aggrieved party to seek modification of the ruling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The `allowance and recovery of costs, being unknown at common law, rests entirely upon the statutory provisions[.]'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nolan“The court of appeals, supreme court, and superior courts may require [the payment of] appellate costs”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nolan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.