Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 Wis. 2d 367 - State v. Edwards

98 Wis. 2d 367 - State v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
7
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably State v. Multaler (2002), 159 Wis. 2d 1 - State v. Rewolinski (1990)

2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

19019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Matlock · Lego v. Twomey · United States v. Bedford · United States ex rel. Beal v. Skaff · 81 Wis. 2d 399 - State v. Starke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`excite an honest belief in a reasonable mind that the objects sought are linked with the commission of a crime, and that the objects sought will be found in the place to be searched.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he burden of proof in a challenge to the existence of probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant is clearly with the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]t would be an unreasonable and unnecessary burden on the [S]tate as well as the courts to force the [S]tate to justify the timeliness of every search warrant executed by requiring a showing that probable cause had not dissipated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.