Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 Wis. 2d 416 - State v. Cramer

98 Wis. 2d 416 - State v. Cramer’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2011

12 state decisions

601980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 84 Wis. 2d 236 - State v. Hungerford · 63 Wis. 2d 362 - Mueller v. Jensen · 71 Wis. 2d 112 - State Ex Rel. Renner v. Department of Health & Social Services · 90 Wis. 2d 754 - State v. Gebarski · 52 Wis. 2d 101 - State v. Torpy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This court has previously announced that it will not ordinarily consider questions which have become moot due to a change in circumstances. State ex rel. Renner v. H&SS Dept., 71 Wis.2d 112, 116 , 237 N.W.2d 699 (1976). However, there are exceptions to this rule. This court will consider questions which are otherwise moot in situations, for example, where the question is one of great public importance, Ibid, at 116, or of public interest, Muller v. Jensen, 63 Wis.2d 362 , 217 N.W.2d 277 (1974); where the problem is likely to recur and is of sufficient importance to warrant a holding which will guide trial courts in similar circumstances, Oshkosh Student Asso. v. Board of Regents, 90 Wis.2d 79 , 279 N.W.2d 740 (1979). . . .” State v. Cramer, 98 Wis.2d 416, 420 , 296 N.W.2d 921 (1980).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.