Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 980 A.2d 117 - In Re Js

In Re Js’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Rathfon · 331 Pa. Super. 501 - In Re Adoption of Crystal D.R. · Geniviva v. Frisk · 2004 Pa. Super. 406 - J.S. v. Whetzel · In Re Lc, II

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “§ 6336.1. Notice and hearing (a) General rule. — The court shall direct the county agency or juvenile probation department to provide the child’s foster parent, preadoptive parent or relative providing care for the child with timely notice of the hearing. The court shall provide the child’s foster parent, preadoptive parent or relative providing care for the child the right to be heard at any hearing under this chapter. Unless a foster parent, preadoptive parent or relative providing care for a child has been awarded legal custody pursuant to section 6357 (relating to rights and duties of legal custodian), nothing in this section shall give the foster parent, preadoptive parent or relative providing care for the child legal standing in the matter being heard by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “These categories logically stem from the fact that upon an adjudication of dependency, the court has the authority to remove a child from the custody of his or her parents or legal custodian. Due process requires that the child’s legal caregiver, be it a parent or other custodian, be granted party status.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Foster Parents did not stand in loco parentis because their status as foster parents was subordinate to CYF, who maintained legal custody and was primarily responsible for the child's care and custody.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.