No. 92-2228’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 881 (§ 511 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Security Industrial Bank · National Football League v. Federal Communications Commission · United States v. United States Currency in the Amount of $2,857.00 · United States v. Beechcraft Queen Airplane Serial Number LD-24 · United States v. One 1978 Piper Navajo PA-31, Aircraft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the party attempting the untimely filing [in a civil forfeiture action] must show excusable neglect or a meritorious defense” (citation omitted)). Under these circumstances, Claimants' failure to meet the filing deadlines imposed by § 983(a)(4) will be excused. 7 . Prior to the enactment of CAFRA, an owner of real property could assert an innocent owner defense under 21 U.S.C. § 881 (a)(7) by showing that the act or omission forming the basis of the forfeiture was committed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In order to show standing to contest a forfeiture, one must first show ownership.... To be heard in court, one must first prove the threshold requirement that he or she is the owner of the property subject to the forfeiture action.”); United States v. $121,100.00 in U.S. Currency, 999 F.2d 1503, 1505 (11th Cir.1993) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“This court has previously stated that it is for the district court to determine what departures from its local rules of practice may be overlooked.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.