Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 980 F.2d 37 - Pearson v. Fair

Pearson v. Fair’s Empirical Analysis

980 F.2d 37 · 1992

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
2
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 18 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Maine School Administrative District No. 35 v. Mr. & Mrs. R. (2003), Brewster v. Dukakis (1993)

17 federal appellate · 18 district · 3 state decisions

1901992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School District · City of Riverside v. Rivera · United Families of America v. Kendrick · Andrijevic v. Kelleran

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The plaintiff must obtain an enforceable judgment against the defendant from whom fees are sought, or comparable relief through a consent decree or settlement. Whatever relief the plaintiff secures must directly benefit him at the time of the judgment or settlement. Otherwise the judgment or settlement cannot be said to “affec[t] the behavior of the defendant toward the plaintiff.” Only under these circumstances can civil rights litigation effect “the material alteration of the legal relationship of the parties ” and thereby transform the plaintiff into a prevailing party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.