Dawan v. Al Lockhart’s Empirical Analysis
980 F.2d 470 · 1992
Citation profile
31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Coleman v. Thompson · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Murray v. Carrier · Evitts v. Lucey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The state asserts ... that a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel must be presented to the state court as an independent claim before being used to establish cause for the procedural default. [Murray ] explains that this is a requirement of the exhaustion doctrine. [Citation omitted]. Here, no state remedies currently are available, and thus the exhaustion requirement is satisfied. [Citation omitted].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“This prejudiced Dawan by leaving him essentially unrepresented at the post-trial proceedings with respect to the conflict-of-interest question and denying him subsequent review of this issue. This ineffectiveness thus establishes the cause necessary to excuse Dawan’s failure to raise the underlying conflict-of-interest question on motion for new trial and appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Robinson v. Norris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.