Klein v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
980 F.2d 521 · 1992
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Independent Petroleum Association of America v. Babbitt, Seeco, Inc. v. Hales (2000)
10 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Salve Regina College v. Russell · Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United Distribution Cos. · Diamond Shamrock Exploration Co. v. Hodel · Western Casualty Surety Company v. National Union Fire Insurance Company a · 603 So. 2d 166 - Frey v. Amoco Production Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Alny determination{s] of the market value of gas which admits the lessee's arrangements to market were prudently arrived at consistent with the lessee's obligation, but which at the same time permits either the lessor or lessee to receive a part of the gross revenues from the property greater than the fractional division contemplated by the lease should be considered inherently contrary to the basic nature of the lease and be sustained only in the clearest of cases.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]t shall be the duty of both the lessee ... [and the purchaser] to protect the royalty of the lessor's interest by paying to the lessor or his assignees the same price, including premiums, steaming charges, and bonuses of whatsoever name for royalty oil or gas that is paid the operator or lessee under the Lease for the working interest thereunder.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he difference in the fair market value of the reserves and the amount paid to Jones and McCoy represented the value paid to Jones and McCoy to settle Arkla's take or pay dispute under GPC 5239,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.