Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

980 F.2d 734

Docket No. 92-1764SD.

Fay v. Thornburgh

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: September 25, 1992. Filed: December 3, 1992.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-09-25

Cited by 21 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1993

19 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-09-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Leighton Fay appeals the District Court's1 dismissal of his successive Section 2255 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. For the reasons given in the well-reasoned opinion of the District Court, Fay's arguments have either been previously decided against him on the merits, or are moot. See Rule 47B.

1

The Hon. Donald J. Porter, Senior United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota

/980/f2d/734 · .json · Public domain